In fact, it`s surprisingly simple. There are three main types of past verbs, and each has its own rules on verb chord. There is no gender agreement or numbers. Good news, isn`t it? If you use Imperfect, you don`t have to worry about the French verb chord in terms of numbers or genres! Bless yourself, imperfect, you are so much simpler than the compound past. Pronoun verbs have a reflexive pronoun that refers to the subject, and this reflexive pronoun represents either the direct object or the indirect object of the verb. Here is the tricky part: the agreement is only necessary if the reflexive pronoun is a direct object; if it is indirect, there is no agreement. So to know if current participants need to agree, you need to determine the function of the reflexive prognosis. That`s how it works. The verbs and themes correspond in terms of gender and number. You may have already noticed this trend in the three examples above. As I have already explained, the verbs of the use of being in the compound past must correspond to the subject, both in number and in sex. If you read a story in the past and see the conjugated form of « Tre, » you should expect there to be a verb arrangement. The encirclement of the right conjugation for the French past – and all the good verbal agreements – can make the memory of past events even more painful.
Of course, if the noun is replaced by an object pronoun, this pronoun is always direct and the reflexive pronoun is always indirect, so there is no agreement with it. However, as the direct object precedes the verb, past participation is subject to a direct object agreement. [Who is washed? » –> « They. » The subject is therefore the recipient of the appeal, there is consensus.] A lot of people want to avoid the direct object agreement – what do you think? Read the article and chat on Facebook: Once you start telling a story from yesterday, though… it`s going to be difficult. We need to do more than a normal verb-subject chord. Sometimes verbs have to consent in another way. If we are in all these rules of agreement French verb, remember, you can always check how combines each verb in all forms. Consider buying a copy of « 501 French Verbs, » or even going to Verbix. Specifically, the French verb agreement is tense in the past. 5) For semi-auxiliary verbs, there is no correspondence with the direct object, because the object always belongs to the infinitive, not the semi-auxiliary object.
The rules of agreement of past participants are different. The fundamental principles are: But having verbs need approval in a very specific construction: the past of participation must correspond to the direct object when it precedes the verb. For some verbs, the Past Participant must agree on sex and number, either with the subject or with the subject of the sentence. This agreement is necessary in the following situations: Now that you know that you are not using verbage with have and that you are using the verb chord with bere, there is another thing you need to know. One of the most difficult parts of past control is the development of the subject agreement. When should you apply certain contractual rules and when can you ignore them? Did you see Romain`s new bike? This is it. [« Roman`s new motorcycle » is the direct object; in the first sentence, it does not conform to the verb; in the second sentence, the personal pronoun « the » is the direct object that replaces « Roman`s new motorcycle »; the old « bought » stake therefore agrees with it.] [Who/what is washed? –> « hands. » « Hands » is the direct object and is placed according to the verb, disagree.] Don`t agree? Give me a wink, a nod or a thumbs up when I`m on something.